APPELLATIVES FOR NAMES OF CLOTHES AND FOOTWEAR BASED ON THE SURNAME DENOMINATIONS AND SURNAMES OF CENTRAL KHMELNYCHINA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31891/2415-7929-2020-20-15Keywords:
anthroponym, appellative, lexical-semantic analysis, lexical-semantic group, surnameAbstract
Lexical and semantic analysis of the surname denominations and surnames of Central Khmelnychyna has been made in the article.
An important task of onomastics is the systematic study of the lexical and semantic structure of onyms, which helps to clarify a number of issues concerning the historical development and formation of the modern Ukrainian literary language. Given the active changes in the vocabulary of our language, we see the need to analyze the surname denominations and surnames of Central Khmelnychyna and to identify in their bases tokens to denote the names of clothes and shoes. This topic was partially researched by K. D. Glukhovtsevа ("Surnames of Luhansk residents, correlated with the names of clothes and shoes"), L. O. Lisova ("Modern names of Volyn, derived from the names of clothes and shoes"), N. O. Yatsenko ("Ukrainian surnames of the XVIIth century, motivated by appellatives to the names of clothes") and others.
The purpose of the work is lexical-semantic analysis and determination of productivity of the surname denominations and surnames of Central Khmelnychyna. The object of our research is the anthroponyms of Central Khmelnychyna, which are based on appellatives to denote the names of clothes, shoes and related names.
Anthroponyms, motivated by appellatives to denote the names of clothes and shoes, are grouped within 5 lexical-semantic groups, which are considered in descending order of their frequency. A study of the surname system of Central Khmelnychyna revealed 152 appellatives to denote the names of clothing and footwear, which became the basis of about 200 anthroponyms. It is established that among the analyzed surnames the lexical-semantic groups “Clothes” (84), “Hats” (43), “Jewelry” (29) show the highest productivity, “Fabrics” (21) and “Shoes” (19) – lower.
It is noted that further study of the surname denominations and surnames of Central Khmelnychyna, the basics of which testify to the negative vocabulary, is needed.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 О. ЮЩИШИНА (Автор)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.